Thursday, 23 February 2017

Brexit boost from Ireland's gas isolation

EU-MEMBER state Ireland’s reliance on British gas is set to strengthen the UK’s hands in the looming Brexit talks, reports Peter McCusker.

WHILE efforts will be made to downplay the politics of Brexit, there’s little doubt they will surface, as Switzerland discovered in its negotiations with the EU three years ago.

When trying to gain access to the European internal energy market talks were curtailed following a Swiss referendum vote on immigration.

The politics of the Brexit talks figured in a submission by Paul Hallas, regulation and strategy director at energy firm Centrica, to the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) Committee in its inquiry ‘Leaving the EU: negotiation priorities for energy and climate change policy’, last month.

He said that in a ‘rational world’, the energy industry would want to preserve as much as possible of the existing internal energy market arrangements.  

However, he expressed fears that, although preservation of the internal energy market’s rules would be in the interests of consumers, energy policy risked being caught up in the politics of the wider Brexit negotiations.

And, as we head for ‘Hard Brexit’ there are concerns that a potential disruption to current trading arrangements between ourselves and the EU would impact on UK energy security and increase prices.

However, the UK does have an ace up its sleeve as European member state, and neighbour, Ireland is dependent on the UK for over half of its gas, with this dependency set to increase over time.

In a recent paper considering ‘Brexit’s Impact on Gas Markets’ Dr Thierry Bros at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies elaborated on this Irish issue saying that Post-Brexit, it would be ‘impossible for Ireland alone to mitigate a serious gas supply disruption’.
He said: “The issue of Irish security of supply is going to be extremely important during negotiations and could be used by the UK to try to preserve the status quo as this is the cheapest way to provide security of supply to Irish consumers.”
In this month’s White Paper unveiling the Government’s 12 Brexit objectives Theresa May said the government is ‘considering all options for the UK’s future relationship with the EU on energy’.

It went on to say that the UK wants to maintain ‘efficient, cross-border trading of energy’.

And, in what may be viewed as veiled threat, it continued ‘the government is particularly keen to avoid disruption to the all-Ireland single electricity market, which covers both the north of the island and the republic’.

Both the UK and Ireland are members the Internal Energy Market (IEM) along with 26 other member states and a recent report for the National Grid says this helps lower gas costs, improves storage and cross-border electricity trading through interconnectors.

Cross-border gas trading plays a key role and experts at world-leading market analysts Platts say at times this winter, when the temperatures have plummeted, we have relied on the Belgian and Dutch interconnectors for up to 20% of our supplies.

Although, over the summer, gas tend to flow the other way as the Continent replenishes it gas storage facilities from the UK’s North Sea supplies.

Last week we reported how a new Teesside gas terminal for LNG will boost UK energy independence and the Government is hoping that further such developments, and the emergence of a UK shale industry will reduce reliant on interconnector gas.

Global Platts associate editor Gary Hornby says that despite the developing single energy market the UK still pays a premium for continental-delivered gas of 5% over the winter.

He says that if the Brexit talks struggle and tariffs are imposed on the UK the pipelines will continue to flow, but believes it will be ‘counter-intuitive for the European Brexit negotiators to make it more difficult for Ireland to secure gas’.

Jon Gluyas, a professor of Geo-Energy at the Durham Energy Institute at Durham University, added: “The Irish economy is now heavily dependent on the IT economy which has a high power demand, and while it is much smaller market than the UK, it depends on the UK for almost all of its gas sup

Follow Peter McCusker on Twitter @mccusker60

Friday, 24 October 2014

The Journal Newspaper Newcastle

Much of my recent work has been published in The Journal newspaper, which is based in Newcastle
See the following link

(Terrible hair...)

I've also pulled together some Energy supplements for The Journal
To see the latest one follow this link.

Tuesday, 17 June 2014

Let's make clean energy cheap

WHICHEVER country has the cheapest energy will get the best jobs and at the moment that is the United States as a result of its shale oil and gas revolution.

This has slashed energy bills, will help make the US energy independent, and has created one million new jobs with a further two million expected.

In a recent World Energy Outlook, the International Energy Agency warned that Europe could lose a third of its global share of exports from energy intensive industries because of price disparities between it and the US.

This is particularly relevant to the North East, which is the only net exporter in the UK, with many of these goods made by the energy-intensive process industries on Teesside.

But many of these companies – representing 30% of the region's industrial base – face energy price rises of up to 30% by 2020 and 50% by 2030, as a result of the UK’s green policies.

There are also concerns over the security of the UK’s energy supplies with businesses facing potential blackouts as early as this winter, due to the loss of significant quantities of baseload, fossil fuel power in place of intermittent renewables.

Steve Holliday, the chief executive of the National Grid, last week warned the UK will have to tailor its energy use to the weather.

Speaking to the Daily Telegraph he said that historically, energy users had "expectations that the supply will always be there" to meet maximum demand.
But "with renewables in the world in which we are moving towards" this would no longer be the case as it would make more sense to shift energy demand to times when the wind blows or the sun shines.
"We have to get used to a world in which when power is cheap we use it, when power is expensive we find a way of not using it," he said.

This seems like a backward step in an advanced economy and is one of the reasons why we need to get on fracking for shale gas. The Royal Society, British Geological Survey, WaterUK and Public Health England all says it’s safe.

Gas has 50% fewer carbon emissions than coal and can act as a low carbon bridge to a less carbon intensive future, alongside nuclear power, energy from waste and renewables, in particular solar.

Last month two close environmental and liberal allies of President Obama, former senators Tim Wirth and Tom Daschle, called for the whole treaty framework of mandatory emissions limits to be scrapped in favour of a greater focus on energy innovation and adaption.

This makes sense. We have to find a way to replace dirty energy technologies with cleaner ones, and develop low carbon technologies that can broadly scale without the need of costly subsidies.

We will have to eventually wean ourselves off fossil fuels but the top down policies we currently have are out of date.

They were drafted when we thought we had reached peak oil, but that has now been overtaken by the shale revolution and we need to enter a new era of climate pragmatism.

Peter McCusker, Energy Writer

Follow Peter McCusker on Twitter @mccusker60

Thursday, 17 April 2014

Scots' go-it-alone vote hitting North Sea investment

THE looming Scottish independence ballot has been affecting investment in the oil and gas industry for over a year, says one of the industry’s leading lights.

Dennis Clark, OBE, chairman of Newcastle fabricators the OGN Group said: “The oil company chief executives don’t like risk and that’s what they see in the North Sea now.

“Will the assets be nationalised? Will the tax situation change? Will management and resources move away from Scotland? These are any one of a million things that could happen.

“Regional managers in the oil companies just can’t answer these questions so oil chiefs would rather spend their money elsewhere, Angola or Brazil, or shale.

“This is already happening; capital is migrating out of the North Sea and into shale. This uncertainty is damaging the industry.”

Cark the former chief executive of Amec Energy is honorary president and founder of NOF Energy.

Clark soundings follow similar comments from many in the industry including BP chief executive Bob Dudley

For more on Dennis Clark, and the energy industry see:

Wednesday, 16 April 2014

15-year contract demands damaging offshore wind industry

SIEMENS became the first offshore wind turbine manufacturer to confirm it plans to set up a base in the UK when it announced it was establishing a blade manufacturing base in Hull, creating 1,000 jobs.

In recent years four of the world’s other main turbine players have signalled their intent to establish factories at UK ports, however none have yet committed, with the length of leases required said to be a major drawback.

Industry insiders say that many of the turbine companies want leases of no more than five years, but the ports, which will have to make substantial investments in berths and other infrastructure, need a 15-year timetable to make it work for them.

One industry expert said: “The strike prices have been set, and the Government wants local content in the supply chain. But the turbine manufacturers looking at building factories in the UK are being put off by the length of leases they are being asked to sign.

“If it was a five-year lease that wouldn’t be a problem, but a 15-year lease is, and if the market does not develop in the way expected this would add insult to injury.

“While the Government has shown its commitment to renewable targets up to 2020, there is no visibility beyond then.”

Associated British Ports has agreed to invest £150m upgrading its port facilities as part of the Siemens deal, although details of the length of lease agreed between the two parties has not been released.

For more on offshore wind and the energy sector see:

Monday, 14 April 2014

Senior UK renewable's boss says offshore wind costs can be halved.

MAJOR efforts are underway to reduce costs in the offshore wind sector with the UK Government saying it aims to see a 50% cut in subsidy levels from 2020 onwards.

DONG Energy is the largest player in the European offshore wind sector and Benj Sykes, its operations director for renewables in the UK, believes it can almost halve costs.

He said: “The industry is under increasing pressure from the Government to show it can bring costs down which may explain why a number of schemes have fallen by the wayside in recent months.

“Building a supply chain will help bring costs down. We believe we are capable of bring costs down by 30 to 40% to £100 per MW/h. In fact DONG wants to go further and is looking at 100 Euros per MW/h (or £80 per MW/h).”

Offshore wind subsidies are currently £155 per MW/h, which is three times the wholesale price of electricity, with the costs being passed on through household and business electricity bills.

Sykes added: “We are currently trialling 8MW turbines and these will drive down the costs. The industry needs to earn the right to exist on a large scale.

“There are still uncertainties, but we are pretty confident. If we show as an industry we can get our costs down then the opportunity is there for the taking, but we have to earn the right to grow as an industry.

“We can create a big industry here in the UK for foundation and turbine manufacturers and the supply chain.”


For more on offshore wind and the energy sector see:

Sunday, 19 January 2014

Fracking opponents should consider the facts.

DURHAM University is currently leading the biggest European-wide project of its kind into the risks associated with fracking for shale oil and gas.
In partnership with other national and international bodies, including Newcastle University, its ReFINE (Researching Fracking in Europe) project aims to create a library of independent research to help inform public awareness of the relative risks associated with the industry.
Its findings are being published in thirteen languages including Arabic, Chinese, Portuguese, Spanish and French.
This research is timely as earlier this week David Cameron said. "We're going all out for shale. It will mean more jobs and opportunities for people, and economic security for our country."
Cameron is keen to see the UK replicate the United States where the shale gas has led to a two-thirds fall in the price of natural gas helping businesses and households slash fuel bills.
The Government wants to see around 40 exploratory UK wells drilled by the end of 2015 – and its commitment has this week seen French oil major Total invest the UK shale industry.
On the other hand last year’s protests in Balcombe, Sussex, indicate the strong feelings of those against further fracking in the UK – and it has been banned in some countries including France.
To date ReFINE has published papers on the risks of water contamination and earthquakes, with further papers coming on well integrity, disposal of fracking fluid and gas emissions.


Simon Bowens, North East and Yorkshire regional campaign coordinator for Friends of the Earth, said: “We know that fracking can trigger earthquakes. The only test-fracking to date in the UK in Lancashire in early 2011 triggered earthquakes. We need to know more about how it happens.
“But we also need to know about the impacts, not just above ground but also below ground. The Lancashire earthquakes distorted the casing around the fracking well. Such problems can increase the risk of leaks of methane and polluted wastewater, threatening groundwater.”
A spokesman for the United Kingdom Onshore Operators Group (UKOOG), which represents shale gas companies, said: “Once hydraulic fracturing commences, real time seismic monitoring will be used to operate a traffic-light warning protocol under which operations will be halted and pressures immediately reduced if a seismic event of magnitude greater than 0.5 above background seismic activity is detected.  This magnitude is well below the energy level that could be felt at the surface.”
Durham University, through its world-renowned Energy Institute, has researched hundreds of thousands of fracking operations and found that the process only caused earth tremors that could be felt on the surface in three places (including Preese Hall, Lancashire in 2011).
Its findings for the ReFINE project say the size and number of felt earthquakes caused by fracking is low compared to other manmade triggers such as mining, geothermal activity or reservoir water storage.
It went on to say the energy released in a fracking event is usually “roughly equivalent to, or even less than, someone jumping off a ladder onto the floor”.
Prof Richard Davies of Durham University, who is leading the ReFINE project, said the claims that the Lancashire earthquake had distorted the well-casing were unproven, saying such incidents are not uncommon.
He said: “The incident in Lancashire was most likely caused by fracking close to an existing fault.
“We are starting two new research projects as part of ReFINE to look into how close to a fault it is safe to drill and which faults in the UK should be avoided because they could shift if fracking occurred near to them.”

Water contamination

The ReFINE research has concluded that it is "incredibly unlikely" that fracking at depths of 2km to 3km below the surface, where most operations take place, would lead to the contamination of  the shallow water aquifers which lie above the gas resources.
Bowens said: “Water contamination from fracking is routinely denied by the industry and its supporters, but evidence from the US suggests problems.
“US authorities investigated complaints of polluted groundwater near the town of Pavillion, Wyoming and came to an initial conclusion that this was likely to be the result of fracking – but then decided not to complete the investigation.”
Prof Davies said: “Fracking is not the cause of the contamination. In Pavillion the wells were not cemented effectively.  So it’s not the fracking itself but often the other associated operations that need to be focussed on.”
A spokesman for the UKOOG said: “Shale gas formations are typically found much deeper underground than conventional oil and gas sources. In the UK, hydrocarbon extraction will therefore be taking place at a depth sufficiently distant from groundwater to ensure that the possibility of any fractures extending into aquifers is negligible.”

Disposal of Fracking fluid

Fracking operations require between 10 to 40m litres of water (equivalent to between four and 16 Olympic sized swimming pools) although in the major Texas shale plays this is still less than that used by either golf courses, power generators or households.
The fracking fluid is made up of water and sand with 0.5% chemicals. Around one third of this returns to the surface with the shale gas where it can be treated with fresh water on site and used for another well, or transported for treatment and disposal in permitted deep injection wells.
There are more than 50 known chemicals that may be added to the water including acids and nitrates. Such chemicals avert microorganism growth, prevent corrosion of metal pipes, and maintain fluid viscosity.
The remaining water stays underground in the shale formation.
A spokesman for the UKOOG said: “Wastewaters are stored in closed metal tanks before being treated in accordance with strict environmental regulation as used extensively across many industrial processes.
“Wastewaters are considered to be an extractive waste and so are regulated under the Mining Waste Directive. This requires operators to formulate waste management plans that identify how wastes are to be minimised, treated, recovered and dispensed of.”
Bowens said: “There are strong suspicions that many contamination cases have been settled out of court with confidentiality clauses banning homeowners from saying anything. We need independent analysis that cuts through the industry’s weasel words.”
Richard Davies said: “If fracking is ever to be used on a large scale in Europe research must be conducted into effective and efficient ways of dealing with flowback water.”
Flowback water also picks up natural contaminants from underground such as radioactive Radium-226 and the ReFINE project will look at the potential concentrations of these compared to other fossil fuels and the nuclear industry.

Air pollution from wells

Bowens said: “Air pollution from fracking wells can pose a health risk, as research from the US again shows. Public Health England recently said that there was a low risk of health impacts, while admitting that there was little evidence. But lack of data doesn’t mean an absence of harm.
“Air emissions don’t just pose health problems. The methane that the fracking aims to produce is a very powerful greenhouse gas. If large amounts of methane escape to the atmosphere rather than being captured, then any claimed climate benefits of gas over coal can be reduced or eliminated. Monitoring in the US shows those levels of these ‘fugitive emissions’ could be significant.”
UKOOG highlight that methane is a natural product of hydrocarbon fields, it contends emissions are not significant and say venting, the process, where gas is burned, will not take place in the UK when a well has started producing.
The ReFINE project highlights there is no existing consensus on the amount of fugitive emissions.

Drilling and completions

One area of keen focus for the ReFINE projects is the integrity of the wells.
Prof Davies says that if the UK shale industry gathers momentum hundreds of wells will be drilled every year.
Durham University has discovered that since onshore drilling began in the UK over a century ago two-thirds of the 2,000-plus drilled wells cannot be found.
Prof Davies said: “Steel corrodes and cement cracks. Once the wells have been completed who will check them? We have an opportunity to up our regulatory regime.”
A spokesman for the UKOOG said: “When all of the oil or natural gas that can be recovered economically from a reservoir has been produced, the land is returned to the way it was before the drilling operations started.
“Wells will be filled with cement and pipes cut off 3 to 6ft below ground level. All surface equipment will be removed and all pads will be filled in with earth or replanted. The land can then be used again by the landowner for other activities, and there will be virtually no signs that a well was once there.”
Bowens concluded: “The UK needs a national debate before deciding whether fracking for shale gas is the answer to the UK’s energy problems. Key to this national debate is accurate, unbiased information and the ReFINE initiative can help provide this. But we need answers to other vital questions, and also critically a Government that hasn’t made its mind up already.”
Follow Peter McCusker on twitter @mccusker60

What is Fracking?
Fracking or the hydraulic fracturing of rock – to release its gas or oil - has been taking place in the UK for over 100 years.
The key to the shale gas revolution has been the ability of shale companies to use the horizontal drilling techniques from the oil industry to penetrate shale layers many miles from the drill pad.
Previously a vertical drilling process would have only been able to extract reserves from rocks around 100ft out from the well.
The technique itself uses water, sand and chemicals to break up rock deep underground to release oil and natural gas.